MatzaAs Sefer Vayikra begins, we are all keenly aware that Pesach is approaching and the smell of cleaning products is in the air.  We have just completed Sefer Shmot with a month of Torah readings describing the construction of the Mishkan and now we begin to read about all the different Korbanot offered therein.

One of the categories of Korbanot is the Mincha offerings. These offerings are all different flour offerings, and just like on Pesach, chametz (leavening) is forbidden  in them. In describing the prohibition for having chametz in the Mincha, the Torah says:

כָּל-הַמִּנְחָה, אֲשֶׁר תַּקְרִיבוּ לַיהוָה–לֹא תֵעָשֶׂה, חָמֵץ: כִּי כָל-שְׂאֹר וְכָל-דְּבַשׁ, לֹא-תַקְטִירוּ מִמֶּנּוּ אִשֶּׁה לַיהוָה.

Every Mincha offering that you bring before Hashem should not be chametz, because all leavening and all honey should not be burnt as a fire offering to Hashem

Yet, I have never seen honey on any of the “not Kosher for Pesach” lists. Why would the Torah use honey as an example of chametz, when we know from experience that it is allowed on Pesach?

Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch says that in order to understand this verse, we need to understand what the difference in practice was in the Temple between leavening and honey, as well as what they are meant to represent.

First, the practical difference: When bringing a Mincha offering, chametz was forbidden both in the portion brought on the Mizbeach (altar) as well as the shirayim (left-overs) which were eaten by the Kohanim and the people. With the honey, however, they were permitted to put honey on the matza they ate, they just couldn’t put honey on the sacrificial dough.

Second, what the leavening and honey represent: As we know from the story of Pesach, Matza represents subjugation to another authority. When we were slaves in Egypt we were only allowed to eat the Bread of Affliction. Our eating of Matza in the Korbanot and on Pesach shows our appreciation to Hashem for having removed our yoke of servitude to the Egyptians – replacing it with the ability (and obligation) to serve the Divine. We show that we recognize that if not for the hand of Hashem אָנוּ וּבָנֵינוּ וּבְנֵי בָנֵינוּ מְשֻׁעְבָּדִים הָיִינוּ לְפַרְעֹה בְּמִצְרַיִם (we would all still be slave to Pharaoh in Egypt).

The honey, on the other hand, represents national sovereignty over the Land of Israel (as in “a land flowing with milk and honey”). Honey is a luxury, only acquired when one has a continuous presence in a land undisturbed by ravaging intruders. By refraining from sacrificing the honey, we acknowledge that our right to the excesses of the land is granted by the same mandate that took us out of Egypt. Only by properly serving Hashem do we retain the right to stay in the land and by choosing to burn the honey on the altar we would be showing that the goodness  is due to the work of our own hands.

With these explanations in mind, we can now understand why leavening is entirely forbidden, while honey is only forbidden on the Mizbeach. Hashem has blessed us with the Land of Israel and expects and desires us to benefit from the goodness it provides. We are supposed to enjoy the honey and use it to enhance our food. At the same time, we are supposed to remind ourselves when bringing those sacrifices where all that good comes from.

On the other hand, the leavening is teaching us to be constantly aware that Hashem did not free us from the slavery of Egypt to do whatever we want. We are here for a reason and must always be aware of our obligation to Hashem.

Note: Honey is NOT chametz and is allowed on Pesach – with a Kosher for Pesach certification.

 

5:7 “‘If he cannot afford an animal from the flock,18 he must bring his penalty for guilt for his sin that he has committed,19 two turtledoves or two young pigeons,20 to the Lord, one for a sin offering and one for a burnt offering. 5:8 He must bring them to the priest and present first the one that is for a sin offering. The priest21 must pinch22 its head at the nape of its neck, but must not sever the head from the body.23 5:9 Then he must sprinkle24 some of the blood of the sin offering on the wall of the altar, and the remainder of the blood25 must be squeezed out at the base of the altar – it is a sin offering. 5:10 The second bird26 he must make a burnt offering according to the standard regulation.27 So the priest will make atonement28 on behalf of this person for29 his sin which he has committed, and he will be forgiven.30 5:11 “‘If he cannot afford31 two turtledoves or two young pigeons,32 he must bring as his offering for his sin which he has committed33 a tenth of an ephah34 of choice wheat flour35 for a sin offering. He must not place olive oil on it and he must not put frankincense on it, because it is a sin offering. 5:12 He must bring it to the priest and the priest must scoop out from it a handful as its memorial portion36 and offer it up in smoke on the altar on top of the other gifts of the Lord – it is a sin offering. 5:13 So the priest will make atonement37 on his behalf for his sin which he has committed by doing one of these things,38 and he will be forgiven.39 The remainder of the offering40 will belong to the priest like the grain offering.’”41 (From Net Bible) In discussing the laws of the sacrifices, a couple laws are particularly interesting.

If one is obligated to bring a chatas offering, an animal offering for an intentional sin, and is unable to do so due to financial constraints, he is allowed to bring a (cheaper) bird offering instead. However, he must also bring a second bird olah offering as an olah. The question is, why does he have to bring this second offering? Didn’t he only commit one sin?!

The Ibn Ezra explains insightfully that perhaps a person in this situation committed a second sin. Maybe as he went to buy the bird offering he thought to himself- “not only have I sinned to Hashem, but I also do not even have enough money to pay for an animal offering!” He then might get angry at God for his pitiful state. This anger in his heart is the cause for a second offering. (An olah/burnt offering is brought when one has sinned through thought.)

Asks the Chi’da, wait a second. The next parsha discusses a person poorer than the last- someone that cannot even afford to buy a couple birds. What should he do? Bring some flour. (Even the most destitute of people can afford some flour.) But the pasuk does not seem to require this person to bring two measures of flour- one for his original sin and one for an olah offering, which the Ibn Ezra explained is for thoughts of complaint against God. Why not? Surely this person is in a greater level of poverty!?

He answers beautifully. No doubt that some people in this dire situation would have great complaints against God. But you know what, says the Chid’a, this person’s negative thoughts are allowed! God forebears this person because of the dire situation that God Himself put him into! God gives us everything- money is one of them and so He realizes that some people’s situations are so dire that they cannot help but resent their position. And God allows this. This is why the person does not have to bring a second olah offering.

A great proof to this idea is from a pasuk in Iyov, which unfortunately I cannot quote, but the gist of it is that people in extreme agony do not really mean what they say. Many times we say things or write things when we are angry or very passionate that we do not really mean. If we would look back a few days later, we might very well regret or dismiss some of those passionate feelings.

Do not judge a fellow Jew for complaining against God until we have been through what this person has. And even if we have been in a similar situation, who are we to tell this person to be quiet?! The calculation is God’s to make not ours.

The lesson I take out of this is that God created all of us with a million unique characteristics. He also knows all the situations that we will find ourselves in, and the level of tolerance that we can have for the negative situations that we are in. We should never complain against God. But even if we do from time to time- most of the time it is because of our pained life. The God understands this anguish and can accept our groans and cries. God is empathetic. This is why He is the ultimate Compassionate Being.

(Taken almost exclusively from Rabbi Frand’s shiur tonight.)

Have a great Shabbos, Yaakov

© 2012 myDvar.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site